Results inquiry 2004
SENSE Mid-Term Review Inquiry 2004.
This page shows the results of the SENSE Mid-Term Review Inquiry 2004. The comments are not shown. A full report will become available when the Mid Tern Review is finished.
Clarification for the assessment graphs
The tables shows several columns:
| # | the absolute number of choices |
| % inc | the percentage including people who did not make a choice |
| % exc | the percentage excluding the people who did not make a choice |
The average is rounded to one digit after the point, and excludes non-voters. The graphs show bars with the absolute number of people who made a certain choice. In the horizontal axis of the bar graphs the assessment is given:
| ? | "no choice" |
| ++ | "Very High" |
| + | "High" |
| ok | "Satisfactory" |
| - | "Low" |
| -- | "Very Low" |
PhD opinion
80 respondents Institute | Choice | # of respondents who chose this |
| CML - Leiden University | 1 |
| Copernicus Institute - Utrecht University | 2 |
| DES/DEB - Nijmegen University | 3 |
| IAW - Vrije Universiteit | 1 |
| IBED - University of Amsterdam | 3 |
| IEW - Vrije Universiteit | 9 |
| IVEM - Groningen University | 4 |
| IVM - Vrije Universiteit | 6 |
| Other institute: (fill in in next box) | 1 |
| WIMEK - Wageningen University and Research Centre | 50 |
Other Institute
: Netherlands Institute of Ecology (1).
Main research field
| Choice | # of respondents who chose this |
| Ecology / Ecotoxicology | 21 |
| Energy and Material Analysis | 2 |
| Environmental Chemistry and Physics | 5 |
| Environmental Economics | 8 |
| Environmental Modelling / Integrated Environmental Assessment | 6 |
| Environmental Policy / Sociology | 5 |
| Environmental Technology | 10 |
| Geological Sciences | 1 |
| Hydrology | 4 |
| Microbiology | 7 |
| Other: (fill in in next box) | 5 |
| Soil Sciences | 4 |
Other main research field
(Free text, ordered as they were entered.)
| Scroll through to see all entries |
| Environmental sociology, anthropology and philosophy of life • | | Agro hydrology • | | Soil Physics • | | Molecular ecology • | | environmental impact analysis of food production systems • | | Growth Economics • | | Psychology • | | Soil Physics • |
|
SENSE Courses followed
| Choice | # of respondents who chose this |
| 14 |
| 1 | 15 |
| 2 | 17 |
| 3 | 19 |
| 4 | 8 |
| 5 | 5 |
| 6 | 2 |
Other Courses followed
| Choice | # of respondents who chose this |
| 20 |
| 1 | 17 |
| 2 | 20 |
| 3 | 9 |
| 4 | 3 |
| 5 | 4 |
| 6 | 3 |
| 8 | 2 |
| 10 | 2 |
Assessment relevance SENSE courses
Average appreciation (5=best):2.6
80 opinions out of 80 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | | 0% | nvt | | Very High | 1 | 1% | 1% | | High | 12 | 15% | 15% | | Satisfactory | 28 | 35% | 35% | | Low | 28 | 35% | 35% | | Very Low | 11 | 13% | 13% |
|  |
Assessment quality SENSE courses
Average appreciation (5=best):3.2
72 opinions out of 80 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 8 | 10% | nvt | | Very High | 1 | 1% | 1% | | High | 22 | 27% | 30% | | Satisfactory | 42 | 52% | 58% | | Low | 7 | 8% | 9% | | Very Low | | 0% | 0% |
|  |
Assessment Course evaluation
Average appreciation (5=best):3.1
68 opinions out of 80 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 12 | 15% | nvt | | Very High | 1 | 1% | 1% | | High | 15 | 18% | 22% | | Satisfactory | 43 | 53% | 63% | | Low | 6 | 7% | 8% | | Very Low | 3 | 3% | 4% |
|  |
Assessment PhD Colloquia
Average appreciation (5=best):3.2
56 opinions out of 80 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 24 | 30% | nvt | | Very High | 7 | 8% | 12% | | High | 17 | 21% | 30% | | Satisfactory | 13 | 16% | 23% | | Low | 16 | 20% | 28% | | Very Low | 3 | 3% | 5% |
|  |
Assessment Summer Symposia
Average appreciation (5=best):3.1
48 opinions out of 80 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 32 | 40% | nvt | | Very High | 3 | 3% | 6% | | High | 14 | 17% | 29% | | Satisfactory | 18 | 22% | 37% | | Low | 12 | 15% | 25% | | Very Low | 1 | 1% | 2% |
|  |
Assessment Core PhD meetings
Average appreciation (5=best):3
51 opinions out of 80 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 29 | 36% | nvt | | Very High | 4 | 5% | 7% | | High | 12 | 15% | 23% | | Satisfactory | 17 | 21% | 33% | | Low | 14 | 17% | 27% | | Very Low | 4 | 5% | 7% |
|  |
Assesment e-News
Average appreciation (5=best):3.7
79 opinions out of 80 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 1 | 1% | nvt | | Very High | 12 | 15% | 15% | | High | 38 | 47% | 48% | | Satisfactory | 22 | 27% | 27% | | Low | 5 | 6% | 6% | | Very Low | 2 | 2% | 2% |
|  |
Assesment Website
Average appreciation (5=best):3.7
80 opinions out of 80 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | | 0% | nvt | | Very High | 14 | 17% | 17% | | High | 36 | 45% | 45% | | Satisfactory | 25 | 31% | 31% | | Low | 5 | 6% | 6% | | Very Low | | 0% | 0% |
|  |
Assesment SENSE
Average appreciation (5=best):3.1
79 opinions out of 80 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 1 | 1% | nvt | | Very High | 5 | 6% | 6% | | High | 20 | 25% | 25% | | Satisfactory | 35 | 43% | 44% | | Low | 18 | 22% | 22% | | Very Low | 1 | 1% | 1% |
|  |
Staff opinion
39 respondents Research Institute
| Choice | # of respondents who chose this |
| CML - Leiden University | 2 |
| Copernicus Institute - Utrecht University | 1 |
| DES/DEB - Nijmegen University | 3 |
| IBED - University of Amsterdam | 2 |
| IEW - Vrije Universiteit | 2 |
| IVEM - Groningen University | 3 |
| IVM - Vrije Universiteit | 3 |
| Other institute: (fill in in next box) | 1 |
| WIMEK - Wageningen University and Research Centre | 21 |
Other Institute
(Free text, ordered as they were entered.)
| Scroll through to see all entries |
| |
Main research field
| Choice | # of respondents who chose this |
| Ecology / Ecotoxicology | 6 |
| Energy and Material Analysis | 3 |
| Environmental Chemistry and Physics | 3 |
| Environmental Economics | 4 |
| Environmental Modelling / Integrated Environmental Assessment | 4 |
| Environmental Policy / Sociology | 1 |
| Environmental Technology | 4 |
| Hydrology | 2 |
| Mathematics / Statistics | 1 |
| Microbiology | 2 |
| Other: (fill in in next box) | 3 |
| Soil Sciences | 2 |
Other main research field
(Free text, ordered as they were entered.)
| Scroll through to see all entries |
| Soil Physics • | | Industrial ecology • | | Systems and Control Engineering • | | general environmental sciences • | | Remote sensing • | | environment - society interactions • | | aquatic ecology • | | industrial ecology • | | ecological economics • |
|
Assessment relevance SENSE courses
Average appreciation (5=best):2.9
36 opinions out of 39 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 3 | 7% | nvt | | Very High | 1 | 2% | 2% | | High | 7 | 17% | 19% | | Satisfactory | 18 | 46% | 50% | | Low | 8 | 20% | 22% | | Very Low | 2 | 5% | 5% |
|  |
Assessment quality SENSE courses
Average appreciation (5=best):3.4
36 opinions out of 39 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 3 | 7% | nvt | | Very High | | 0% | 0% | | High | 18 | 46% | 50% | | Satisfactory | 15 | 38% | 41% | | Low | 1 | 2% | 2% | | Very Low | 2 | 5% | 5% |
|  |
Assessment PhD Colloquia
Average appreciation (5=best):3.3
37 opinions out of 39 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 2 | 5% | nvt | | Very High | 3 | 7% | 8% | | High | 13 | 33% | 35% | | Satisfactory | 15 | 38% | 40% | | Low | 4 | 10% | 10% | | Very Low | 2 | 5% | 5% |
|  |
Assessment Summer Symposia
Average appreciation (5=best):3.1
35 opinions out of 39 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 4 | 10% | nvt | | Very High | 1 | 2% | 2% | | High | 11 | 28% | 31% | | Satisfactory | 16 | 41% | 45% | | Low | 5 | 12% | 14% | | Very Low | 2 | 5% | 5% |
|  |
Assessment Core PhD meetings
Average appreciation (5=best):3.2
35 opinions out of 39 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 4 | 10% | nvt | | Very High | 1 | 2% | 2% | | High | 16 | 41% | 45% | | Satisfactory | 11 | 28% | 31% | | Low | 4 | 10% | 11% | | Very Low | 3 | 7% | 8% |
|  |
Assessment e-News
Average appreciation (5=best):3.7
37 opinions out of 39 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 2 | 5% | nvt | | Very High | 4 | 10% | 10% | | High | 23 | 58% | 62% | | Satisfactory | 8 | 20% | 21% | | Low | | 0% | 0% | | Very Low | 2 | 5% | 5% |
|  |
Assessment Website
Average appreciation (5=best):3.8
36 opinions out of 39 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 3 | 7% | nvt | | Very High | 4 | 10% | 11% | | High | 23 | 58% | 63% | | Satisfactory | 8 | 20% | 22% | | Low | 1 | 2% | 2% | | Very Low | | 0% | 0% |
|  |
Assesment SENSE
Average appreciation (5=best):3.2
37 opinions out of 39 reactions
| Opinion | # | % inc | % exc | | no choice | 2 | 5% | nvt | | Very High | 1 | 2% | 2% | | High | 12 | 30% | 32% | | Satisfactory | 20 | 51% | 54% | | Low | 2 | 5% | 5% | | Very Low | 2 | 5% | 5% |
|  |